Inclusion of inherited functions result in very cluttered and nonsensical class refs

Background
Inherited member functions used to be excluded from class refs. However, this is no longer the case. I'm guessing this is either:

• Done so that users can see all available functions, without having to read an ancestor's class ref, or
• A bug in QDoc

There are some bad side-effects:

Issues

1. Many benefits of convenience classes are lost – they now look as complicated and intimidating as their abstract ancestors
   • E.g. Contrast the Qt 5 with the Qt 4.8 versions of the QStringListModel docs. The latter is much easier to read and understand than the former
2. Nonsensical listings now exist
   • E.g. QStringListModel lists functions such as insertColumn(). "Columns" have no meaning in a list model
3. SOME constructors and destructors of ancestor classes are shown too
   • E.g. QCommandLinkButton shows destructors for QAbstractButton and QPaintDevice (but strangely, not for QPushButton)

Suggestion
Revert to old Qt 4.8 doc-generation behaviour, so that it's easier to see which functions were introduced or reimplemented by a subclass