Uploaded image for project: 'Qt'
  1. Qt
  2. QTBUG-77518

benchmark PDFium and poppler; compare the footprint

    XMLWordPrintable

Details

    • Task
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • P4: Low
    • None
    • None
    • PDF
    • None

    Description

      As with QTBUG-77517: if we are going to tell customers that they should use QtPDF, and the rendering is based only on PDFium, that should be based on something more than just the license.

      In particular we should figure out the cost in both space and time. We know that using PDFium implies bundling a rendering engine (Skia) and probably a JS engine (V8?) But those are already built as part of qtwebengine anyway: so we can say that Qt already bundles those engines if you are using qtwebengine.

      So which way is faster?

      If we do something for QTBUG-77505, the footprint is meant to shrink. But will performance improve or get worse?

      Attachments

        Issue Links

          No reviews matched the request. Check your Options in the drop-down menu of this sections header.

          Activity

            People

              srutledg Shawn Rutledge
              srutledg Shawn Rutledge
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              1 Start watching this issue

              Dates

                Created:
                Updated:

                Gerrit Reviews

                  There are no open Gerrit changes