For other unit test frameworks, I'm used to having inequality (!=, <, <=, >, >=) treated as first-class assertions. In QTestLib, however, only equality is a first-class assertion (via QCOMPARE) , everything else must be shoe-horned through QVERIFY. This creates problems for me, because, unlike QCOMPARE, QVERIFY doesn't print the values of the RHS and LHS expressions on failure.

I suggest to add QCOMPARE_(EQ,NE,LT,GT,LE,GE) to directly express ==, !=, <, >, <=, and >=, resp.

Yes, QCOMPARE_EQ is then the same as QCOMPARE. Sure me. I like symmetry.