Currently the coding style is fixed and might not match the one desired by the user.

The following code brings up two ways this could be improved:

void myMethod(QString const * s);

• Refactoring brings up an option to reformat to const QString * s, but the other way around might be more relevant if your coding style is to put const keywords after the type, however it is not possible. As a side note, this option is not brought up by QString const s, although one could expect it to.
• Using one of the Refactor/Add definition options will generate the following code, regardless of the coding style used in the method declaration. See Bug report 11439 on that issue.

  void MyClass::myMethod(const QString * s)
  {
  }
  

This doesn't sound like too complicated an addition, as there are already options for coding style relative to spacing around const keywords, and the refactor option already exists.