Details

    Description

      IT has been discussing how they could improve their processes related to bigger changes in IT-systems. And especially how to avoid problems when changes are done. One example was qt-project.org email server related change. It should have been planned, documented and communicated better. For example roll-back was not possible as person who did changes was on holiday when problems started. Others did not know what was changed and what to rollback.

      IT guys said that for some services (like mailman) version control is hard to establish or at least more work. Is that still worth to study...maybe or at least reasons for some other approach should be communicated to R&D. Then everyone knows why some approach was selected.

      markopm said that IT should start using Jira for their planning. That would be also channel for at least internal Qt employees to get visibility and also help if they have knowledge of some specific area.

      Reason for this ticket: petri.puurunen to communicate these plans is somehow...is it Intra news or Jira user story with sub-tasks that is up to IT to decide. Main thing is that everyone knows how this is improving and also Qt employees can comment and help if they want.

      Attachments

        No reviews matched the request. Check your Options in the drop-down menu of this sections header.

        Activity

          People

            matuomik Matti Tuomikoski
            olhirvon Olli Hirvonen
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            4 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:

              Gerrit Reviews

                There are no open Gerrit changes