Uploaded image for project: 'Qt'
  1. Qt
  2. QTBUG-8978

WSAASyncSelect VS IOCP Completion Port and overlapped IO (1000 Connections Feature Request)

XMLWordPrintable

    • Icon: Suggestion Suggestion
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • Icon: P4: Low P4: Low
    • None
    • 4.6.2
    • Network
    • None

      Not one time i hear from people recomendation using boost::asio instead QtNetwork. I compare source and descriptions both library for Windows implementation. And Qt and asio using Overlapped I/O, but Qt use WSAASyncSelect for receive sockets events, asio use IOCP (Completion Port). How about migrate to IOCP too? People say what IOCP get more stability for server and this also get reason for remove CreateWindow from QEventDispatcher_win.cpp

        No reviews matched the request. Check your Options in the drop-down menu of this sections header.

            Unassigned Unassigned
            romank Roman Kiseliov
            Votes:
            0 Vote for this issue
            Watchers:
            1 Start watching this issue

              Created:
              Updated:

                There are no open Gerrit changes