Uploaded image for project: 'Qt'
  1. Qt
  2. QTBUG-8978

WSAASyncSelect VS IOCP Completion Port and overlapped IO (1000 Connections Feature Request)

    XMLWordPrintable

Details

    • Suggestion
    • Resolution: Unresolved
    • P4: Low
    • None
    • 4.6.2
    • Network
    • None

    Description

      Not one time i hear from people recomendation using boost::asio instead QtNetwork. I compare source and descriptions both library for Windows implementation. And Qt and asio using Overlapped I/O, but Qt use WSAASyncSelect for receive sockets events, asio use IOCP (Completion Port). How about migrate to IOCP too? People say what IOCP get more stability for server and this also get reason for remove CreateWindow from QEventDispatcher_win.cpp

      Attachments

        Issue Links

          No reviews matched the request. Check your Options in the drop-down menu of this sections header.

          Activity

            People

              Unassigned Unassigned
              romank Roman Kiseliov
              Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              1 Start watching this issue

              Dates

                Created:
                Updated:

                Gerrit Reviews

                  There are no open Gerrit changes